top of page
  • brandy0208

Reasons to Avoid Presumptive Notes

In the healthcare field, the significance of accurate and evidence-based documentation cannot be emphasized enough. However, a concerning trend that I am starting to see is healthcare professionals, including physicians and nurses, are venturing beyond their scope by writing presumptive notes—attempting to attribute causes to poor patient outcomes. This exploration delves into the reasons why healthcare providers should refrain from such practices, examining the legal consequences of medical malpractice litigation, and the economic impact on both plaintiff attorneys and the defense.


Not Having all of the Information:

   

Healthcare professionals may lack the specialized knowledge required to definitively pinpoint the causes of complex medical outcomes. Additionally, they may not be privy to the extensive patient history before entry into the hospital. While specialized in a certain area, presuming causation without a comprehensive understanding of the patient's full history can lead to inaccurate conclusions.

Scope of Practice:


Operating within the bounds of their professional scope is crucial for physicians and nurses. Offering presumptive opinions may exceed these boundaries, resulting in legal ramifications and potential damage to professional reputations.


Avoiding Blame or Fault Assignment:


Whether intentionally writing a statement of causation or not, it is crucial to avoid assigning blame or fault to another member of the healthcare team. Presumptive notes, even if meant as an observation, can inadvertently contribute to a culture of blame within the healthcare system.


Plaintiff attorneys may find presumptive notes advantageous, using them as a starting point for building a case. These notes may emotionally sway a jury, creating a perception of negligence even in the absence of concrete evidence. For defendants, the challenge lies in disproving presumptive claims. The burden of proof may be higher, as these claims often lack a solid factual foundation.


Regional Variations in Medical Malpractice Litigation:


Some states permit medical malpractice cases to be filed without stringent factual support. This can lead to an increased number of frivolous lawsuits, straining both the legal system and healthcare professionals. Contrastingly, certain states demand concrete evidence before permitting the filing of medical malpractice complaints. This approach aims to filter out baseless claims, promoting a more judicious use of legal resources.


Economic Impact:


Filing cases based on presumptive notes can incur substantial costs for plaintiff attorneys. The need for thorough investigation and expert testimonies can strain financial resources, particularly when the foundation of the case is weak. For defendants, the economic impact is felt in defending against potentially frivolous claims. Legal fees, expert witnesses, and time spent on cases lacking merit contribute to a strain on healthcare institutions and providers.


In conclusion, navigating the complex landscape of medical malpractice litigation requires a commitment to factual, evidence-based documentation. Healthcare professionals must exercise caution to avoid presumptive notes, understanding the legal and economic repercussions that may follow. Striking a balance between accountability and fair representation in legal proceedings is crucial to maintaining the integrity of both the healthcare and legal systems.

8 views

Comments


bottom of page